HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1125 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. Learned Additional C.S.C. says that the preliminary inquiry has been instituted on the complaint of the petitioner under Rule 3 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 read with Section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947. 3. If being so, the same will have to be taken to its logical conclusion as per law. 4. We are not inclined to examine the issue any further in the present writ petition. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. November 4, 2025 Arti/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Vajpayee, Atul Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Anshu Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench