HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12164 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. Nobody is present to press the writ petition and no request for adjournment of the case has been made. Therefore, the Court proceeds to examine the writ petition with the assistance of Sri Rahul Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. 2. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the opposite parties to get an inquiry conducted by an independent agency into the allegations of financial and administrative irregularities committed by the opposite party no. 8-Gram Pradhan. 3. It has been stated in paragraph 4 of the writ petition that the petitioner has no personal interest in the matter yet he has filed the writ petition in personal capacity seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus. 4. For issuance of a writ of mandamus, the existence of a legally enforcible right and infringement thereof is a prerequisite. 5. In absence of the petitioner's personal right being involved in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajdev Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Panchyati Raj Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) the matter, he has no locus standi to file a writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. December 15, 2025 Pradeep/- WRIC No. 12164 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench