NAUMILAL v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/6107/2025 · 2025-11-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6107 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.68 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2) of BNS and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Salon, District Raebareli.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the sister of the informant aged about 17 went missing. Subsequently, in the statement 183 of BNSS, the victim did not support the prosecution story and stated that she married with the applicant. The tentative age of the victim is around 18 years.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the statements of the victim not supporting the prosecution story and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 26.03.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .
6. Let the applicant Naumilal be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv Pal Singh, Ambrish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Naumilal .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 11, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 6107 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench