f I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 308 OF 2021 Appeal under section 100 of CPC, aggrieved by the Decree and Judgment dated 05-03-2021 in A.S.No. 29 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the II Additional District Judge at Parvathipuram in confirming the Decree and Judgment in O.S.No.54/2008 dated 19-04-2016 on the file of the Court of the Civil (Senior Division) Judge, Bobbili consequently Decree the Suit in O.S.No.54/2008 by granting the Main Relief of Specific Performance. Between; Allu Sankara Rao, S/o late Jagannadham, Aged about 48 years, R/o Gudepu Veedhi, Salur, Vizianagaram District. ...Appellant / Appellant / Plaintiff AND 1. Seedharapu Savitri, W/o Pushparao, Aged about 54 years, R/o Theenusamanthavalasa, H/o Kandulapadam, Salur Mandal, Vizianagaram District. 2. Mandangi Narayanamma, W/o Rajarao, Aged about 41 years, R/o Theenusamanthavalasa, H/o of Kandulapadam, Salur Mandal, Vizianagaram District. 3. Pamidimukkala Venkayya Chowdary, (Died) 4. Sunkari Nagulamma, (Died) 5. Sunkari Krishna Kumari, W/o Raghavayya, Aged about 4lyears, R/o kandulapadam Village, Salur Mandal, Vizianagaram District. 6. Sunkari Raghavayya, S/o late Rajendra Prasad, Aged about 48 years R/o kandulapalam village, Salur Mandal, Vizianagaram District. 7. Sunkari Gowrisankararao, S/o late rajendra Prasad Aged about 45 years, R/o kandulpalam Village, Salur Mandal, Vizianagram District. ...Respondents / Respondents / Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 r/w. Section praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Temporary Injunction in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondent by restraining the Respondent, his men, agents and followers from ever interfering with my peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over the Petition Schedule Properties till the disposal of the main Suit. 151 CPC Counsel for the Appellant :SRI. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. G. RAMA GOPAL The Court made the following: m THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.308 of 2021 JUDGMENT: Today when the matter is listed under the caption 'for withdrawal', learned counsel for the appellant would submit that he filled a Memo dated 03-01-2025, before the Registry for withdrawing this appeal and the same is placed on record. The representation made by the learned counsel for the appellant is recorded. 1. 2 Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR T //TRUE COPY// IKSECTION OFFICER To 1. The II Additional District Judge at Parvathipuram (with records) 2. The Civil (Senior Division) Judge, Bobbili (with records) 3. One CC to Sri. Narasimha Rao Gudiseva Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. G. Rama Gopal Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, V R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 6. Three CD Copies Pr vna HIGH COURT DATED:07/01/2025 ORDER *No5^ ^ 'S 2 A JAN 2025 | ^ Current Section SA.No.308 of 2021 O If DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS