MAHESH KANT PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LUCKNOW and ANR.
WRIA/16760/2017 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173289 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173289 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 16760 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. consigned to record. November 24, 2025 Arti/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Ehtesham Khan, Ram Prakash Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., C.B. Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Mahesh Kant Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench