HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10702 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated September 25, 2025 filed by the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that raising their grievances the petitioners have filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however, the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No. 3 i.e. District Program Coordinator, MANREGA, Bahraich should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.3 i.e. District Program Coordinator, MANREGA, Bahraich is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Sonkar, Gaurav Krishna, Syed Ahmad Jamal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Radheshyam Tiwari And 28 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Development Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 4, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 10702 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench