DHARMENDRA KUMAR AND 69 OTHERS v. SRI SHUBHAM SHUKLA, DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER BALRAMPUR
CAPL/3591/2025 · 2025-11-11
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3591 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that inadvertently, certain facts and documents are left to be mentioned/enclosed along with the present contempt application which are necessary for proper adjudication of the present contempt application and prays for withdrawal of the same as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. As prayed, the present contempt application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. Office is directed to return the original copy of the relevant documents, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants after retaining photocopy of the same. November 11, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Onkar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Dharmendra Kumar And 69 Others .....Applicant(s) Sri Shubham Shukla, District Basic Education Officer Balrampur .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench