M/S RAJESH BRICK FIELD THRU. PROPRIETOR,RAJESH JASHWANI KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/10579/2025 · 2025-11-04
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10579 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. The present recovery certificate bearing letter No. 609 (ii) dated 16.09.2025/17.09.2025 is issued for a period starting from 2012-13 till 2017-18.
3. We are unable to understand as to why these recovery proceedings have been initiated by the department with such an inordinate delay.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the entire demand has already been paid by the petitioner and proof of the same has been annexed with the writ petition.
5. In light of the same, the department is directed to peruse the entire writ petition and the annexures and thereafter proceed in accordance with law.
6. The present recovery notice is quashed and set aside with liberty granted to the respondents authorities to properly examine the receipts provided by the petitioner, call for further Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Nath Dubey, Ankit Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. M/S Rajesh Brick Field Thru. Proprietor,Rajesh Jashwani Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Commercial Taxes And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
documents, if so required and only thereafter proceed against the petitioner, if so advised.
7. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. November 4, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 10579 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench