HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6473 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Vinay Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ashish Saxena, the learned Standing Counsel for the State, who has raised a preliminary objection that the State of U.P. has wrongly been impleaded in this petition whereas it is not a party in the civil proceedings which are sought to be expedited. 2. A perusal of the record indicates that the heirs of the deceased's defendant are yet to be substituted. 3. In these circumstances, no direction for expeditious disposal of the suit can be given at this stage. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to file a fresh petition at appropriate stage. November 4, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar, Ajay Kumar Verma, Shubham Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ram Sagar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench