Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17326 (AP)

Mittina Vinayaka Eswara Rami Reddy, v. Mittina (Patna) Kumari,

CRP/1063/2021 · 2025-07-31

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010235792021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY. THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1063 OF 2021 Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India aggrieved by the order in O.P.No.1598 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Between: Mittina Vinayaka Eswara Rami Reddy, S/o.Somulu, aged 31 Van Driver, R/o. 5-104, Marikgvalasa Village District. years. Private P.M.Palem, Visakhapatnam ...Petitioner/Petitioner AND Mittina Patna Kumari, W/o. Mittina Vinayaka Eswara Rami Reddy, Aged 27 R/o. Kunchuvanipalem, Bhogapuram Mandal, years. House Wife, Vizianagaram District. ...Respondent/Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following ORDER: APHC010235792021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1063/2021 [3505] Between: 1.MITTINA VINAYAKA ESWARA RAMI REDDY S/O.SOMULU, AGED 31 YEARS, PRIVATE VAN DRIVER, R/ 0.5-104, MARIKAVALASA VILLAGE, P.M.PALEM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.MITTINA PATNA KUMARI, W/o.Mittina Vinayaka Eswara Rami Reddy, Aged 27 R/o.Kunchuvanipalem, Bhogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District. years. House Wife, ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toPetitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition to this Hon'ble Court against non disposal of O.P.No. 1598/2019 on the file of Family Court, Visakhapatnam, for the following among other grounds. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: % THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1063 of 2021 ORDER: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE' FICER To, The Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, (with records if any) One CC to Sri. Bolla Venkata Rama Rao, Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. Two CD Copies 1. 2. 3. 4. sree HIGH COURT DATED:01/08/2025 ^^TOfANoTJ^ i 22 mm ^ V ^ Current aeciion ORDER CRP NO. 1063 OF 2021 ©9/ DISMISSING THE C.R.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS