DR. MANOJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. ANIMAL HUSBANDARY, LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/14351/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173256 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173256 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14351 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. Deep Shikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel for opposite party Nos.1 & 2.
2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 05.12.2025 granting Special Casual Leave to Veterinary Doctors on two days for participation in the Annual General Meeting of their registered Unions.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the aforesaid order is in violation of Government Order dated 30.06.2014 which requires providing of such leave only to Members of Registered Unions in terms of Regulations of 1979.
4. Ms. Deep Shikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel for opposite party Nos.1 & 2 has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this petition in view of the fact that petitioner does not have any locus to challenge the impugned order considering the fact that he has not disclosed as to how he would be affected by the order.
5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that earlier he was terminated from service vide order 04.11.2025 which was challenged in Writ-A No. 17293 of 2025 in which an interim order has been granted on 10.12.2025.
6. However, learned counsel for petitioner has not been able to indicate as to how petitioner would be affected by the grant of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aashish Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dr. Manoj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Animal Husbandary, Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
aforesaid Special Casual Leave. There is settled law that no P.I.L. is entertainable in service matters.
7. In view of discussion made here-in-above, petitioner does not appear to have any locus to challenge the order impugned.
8. Petition therefore fails and is dismissed at the admission stage itself. Parties to bear their own costs. December 16, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 14351 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench