Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173246 (ALL)

PANKAJ TRIPATHI v. NAYAB TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL BABAGANJ, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS

A227/6703/2025 · 2025-11-17

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6703 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos. 1. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1 i.e. Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Babaganj, District Pratapgarh to decide the mutaiton case bearing no. 5105/2021 and Computerized Case No. T202102570105105 (Pankaj Tripathi Vs. Dev Raj Singh), under Section 34 U.P. Revenue Code 2006, pending before him, within stipulated time 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 i.e. i.e. Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Babaganj, District Pratapgarh is directed to make all endeavor to decide the mutaiton case bearing no. 5105/2021 and Computerized Case No. T202102570105105 (Pankaj Tripathi Vs. Dev Raj Singh), under Section 34 U.P. Revenue Code 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Nath Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pankaj Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Babaganj, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment, subject to condition that counsel for the petitioner shall appear on all the date fixed and in case he does not appear on the date fixed, the benefit of the order shall not be available to the petitioner. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 17, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6703 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench