Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173235 (ALL)

SACHIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/1718/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1718 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 13.05.2025 No. 62 of 2025, filed under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 118(1), 352, 109(1), 288, 351(3), 117(2) BNS., Police Station Kohdaur, District Pratapgarh as well as summoning order dated 09.07.2025 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Room No.23, Pratapgarh in Case No.8870 of 2025 (State vs. Sachin Kumar and other) and further proceedings arising out of Case Crime No.0127 of 2024. 3. At the very outset, counsel for the applicant states that the offence is punishable upto seven years and applicant will apply for bail. However, he has submitted that the applicant may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (AIR 2022 SC 3386). 4. It is therefore, directed that in case the applicant applies for bail before the Court concerned within one week from today, the court below will decide the said bail application within two weeks thereafter taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 5. For a period of three weeks. no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 6. The application stands disposed of. 7. It is made clear that no application for extension of time shall be entertained if this order is not availed by the applicant in the stipulated period of time. November 26, 2025 Pks Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Shankar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) Sachin Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench