RIPPAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/10823/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173234 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173234 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10823 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. We have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents has filed his instructions in Court, which is taken on record. He submits that the respondent-authorities are not encroaching on the land of the petitioner.
3. In our view, this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction upon the petitioner to file an application under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a week. In case such an application is filed within a week, the demarcation proceedings should be completed within a period of three weeks of the same after granting an opportunity of hearing to all the relevant persons.
4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
5. Till the demarcation proceedings are completed, the construction work of the police chauki shall remain stayed. November 26, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Rippal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench