Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173230 (ALL)

DHEERAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU.ITS SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/820/2025 · 2025-11-07

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 820 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.184 of 2024, under Sections 69, 79, 352, 351(2), 351(3) of BNS and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Sangrampur, District Sultanpur. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the informant came in contact with the applicant and thereafter on the false pretext of marriage, physical relations were formed on various occasions. Subsequently, some photos were made viral. The tentative age of the victim is around 20 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the facts that the physical relations were formed on various occasions coupled with the fact the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 10.10.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Dheeraj Kumar be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Shukla, Prashant Dubey, Shrikant Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Virendra Mishra Dheeraj Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru.Its Secy. Deptt. Of Home And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 7, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 820 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench