AJAB SINGH TOMAR ALIAS AJJU TOMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
C482/604/2022 · 2025-12-11
Ashish Naithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17323 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17323 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:11066
(Compounding Appl. No.01 of 2022) In C482 No.604 of 2022 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Kanti Ram, learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Mr. Mahavir Kohli, learned counsel for Respondent no.2.
4. Present Application has been filed by the Applicant under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. alongwith compounding application paper no.29, which is supported with the affidavits of applicant and respondent no.2 wherein parties have annexed their signatures.
5. By means of this C482 application, applicant has sought quashing of the charge sheet dated 30.06.2021, summoning order dated 18.09.2021 as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.5044 of 2021 (Case Crime No.123 of 2021) under Section 354, 354-A IPC registered at P.S. Premnagar, District Dehradun pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun.
6. Applicant as well as respondent no.2 are present in the Court. They are duly identified by their respective counsels.
7. Learned counsel for the parties have filed their respective affidavits along with the compounding application stating therein that they do not wish to pursue the present criminal case any further and a compromise has been entered between them.
8. Learned State counsel has opposed the compounding application.
9. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
10. In view of the principle of law laid down by Ho’ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303, criminal proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interest to restore peace and harmony between them.
11. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.5044 of 2021 (Case Crime No.123 of 2021) under Section 354, 354-A IPC registered at P.S. Premnagar, District Dehradun pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun are hereby quashed.
12. Accordingly instant C482 application stands disposed of.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
11.12.2025 Arti