IN 111 Surbhi and a State of Pun CORAM: PRESENT: SANJAY V 1. Constitution No.2 & 3, t have marrie 2. Surbhi, aged solemnized members, a petitioners f It has been in the matri protection in instant petit (Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG and another Versus Punjab and others AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SA ENT: Mr. Simranjot Singh, Advocate Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate for AY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) Prayer in the instant petition titution of India, is for issuance of d & 3, to provide protection of lives an married against the wishes of responde Learned counsel for the petition , aged 26 years and petitioner No.2– nized marriage on 20.01.2025, aga ers, arrayed as respondents No.4 a oners further submits that it is the first been submitted that the private respon matrimonial life of the petitioners. ction in that regard and have approach t petition. They have also submitted a exure P-4), to respondents No.2 and F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH CRWP-805-2025(O&M Decided on :27.01.202 . . . Petitione ersus . . . Responden E SANJAY VASHISTH vocate for te for the petitioners. **** etition filed under Article 226 of th e of directions to official responden ives and liberty of the petitioners, wh ndents No. 4 and 5. petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 –Pardeep Singh aged 30 years, hav , against the wishes of their fami 4 and 5. Learned counsel for th he first marriage of both the petitioner respondents are threatening to interfe ers. Hence, the petitioners are seekin proached this Court by way of filing th itted a representation dated 21.01.202 and 3, wherein, they have expresse O&M) 01.2025 titioners ondents of the ondents rs, who r No.1– rs, have family for the itioners. interfere seeking iling the 01.2025 pressed RASHMI 2025.01.27 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-805 their appreh 3. 4. notice on be learned Stat 5. to responden representati if there is an ensure that hands of the 6. have taken criminal act law. January 2 Rashmi Whether spea Whether Repo 805-2025(O&M) apprehension. Notice of motion to respondent On advance notice, Mr. Amand on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 (S Let requisite copies of the com d State counsel during course of the d Accordingly, the present petitio pondent No.2– The Superintendent of sentation dated 21.01.2025 (Annexure re is any substance in it, take necessary e that the lives and liberty of the peti of the private respondents. However, this direction will n taken place between the parties and w nal action, which could be initiated i 27, 2025 speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Reportable: Yes/No - 2 - ndents No.1 to 3 only. mandeep Singh, DAG, Punjab, accep to 3 (State). he complete paper book be supplied f the day. petition is disposed of with a directio ent of Police, Ludhiana, to look into th nexure P-4), qua threat perception, an cessary steps, in accordance with law, e petitioners are not jeopardized at th will not validate the marriage said and will have no effect on any civil o iated in the matter in accordance wi (SANJAY VASHISTH JUDGE accepts plied to irection into the ion, and law, to d at the said to civil or ce with ISTH) RASHMI 2025.01.27 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document