NIYAZ ANSARI ALIAS NIYAZ v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5457/2025 · 2025-07-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17322 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17322 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:18139 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5457 of 2025
Niyaj Ansari @ Niyaz, aged about 25 years Son of Md. Mustakim Miyan @ Mustakim Ansari, resident of Village- Barapansari, P.O- Bamangama, P.S-Sarath, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Choudhary , Adv. For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. PP.
02 / 07.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 53 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B, 66C, 66D, 84C of I.T. Act..
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has defrauded the victim namely Anju Devi Jain to the tune of Rs. 5,896/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and one mobile phone with two SIM cards were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 13 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 29.03.2025 , as mentioned in para 12 of this bail application. It is next submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes to transfer Rs. 5,896/- to the bank account of Anju Devi Jain without prejudice to his defence
in this case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail showing the proof that the petitioner has transferred Rs. 5,896/- to the bank account of Anju Devi Jain without prejudice to his defence in this case on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 47 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-