Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010175622015
2025:GAU-AS:712
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1663/2015 ATUL MEDHI S/O LT. PAD RAM MEDHI, R/O RATANPUR, P.O. NAGAON, P.S. SADAR, PIN- 782001, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PWD ROADS, DISPUR, GHY-6, ASSAM 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD ROADS CHANDMARI GHY-3 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NAGAON STATE ROAD DIVISION NAGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.K PATHAK, MD S ALI,MR. M DASGUPTA,MR B K KAR,MR.N DEKA,MR.P P BARUAH,MR.M GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : MR.H BURAGOHAIN, MS.B BHUYAN(SC, PWD),SC, PWD(R1- 3),MS. M BHATTACHARJEE
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
O R D E R
23.01.2025
Heard Mr. M. Dasgupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, who fairly submits that the claim of the petitioner for payment of Rs. 9,33,551/- for execution of work of maintenance and repair of road at Puranigudam Chapanalla road has been disputed by the respondent authorities by furnishing a detail chart showing the tax deduction of the said amount, therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to avail the appropriate remedy. Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Govt. Advocate for the respondents has raised no objection for such prayer for withdrawal. The prayer of the petitioner is accepted. The writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy as may be permissible under the law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant