BEEPENDRA @ VIPENDRA SONVANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/10561/2025 · 2025-12-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10561 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. A joint Vakalatnama filed by Sri Vinod Kumar Yadav, Advocate and Sri Sachin Madheshiya, Advocate on behalf of opposite party No.2 is taken on record. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 39531 of 2019 (State versus Beependra Sonvani and others) arising out of case crime no.200 of 2018, under Sections 498-A, 323 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District Lucknow on the basis of compromise between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that now parties have entered into compromise, therefore, this Court may please to quash the proceeding for which learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has no objection. 5. Under such facts and circumstances, applicants are directed to file compromise deed dated 07.08.2024 along-with application before the trial Court for verification. In case any such application is filed along with compromise deed dated 07.08.2024 within two weeks from today, trial court shall fix a date for the verification of the compromise entered into between the parties within four weeks. 6. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below as such compromise has to be duly Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakant Sahu, Shambhu Shanker Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Beependra @ Vipendra Sonvani And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 7. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 8.
The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 9. For a period of one month, the proceedings of the aforesaid case shall remain stayed. 10. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 15, 2025 I.A. Siddiqui A482 No. 10561 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMRAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench