PAWAN SAW ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3577/2025 · 2025-07-07
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17320 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17320 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:18104 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3577 of 2025 ------
1. Pawan Saw @ Pawan Kumar, aged about 23 years, son of Bikram Saw @ Bikram Prasad Gupta.
2. Raju Kumar, aged about 28 years, son of Bhikhan Saw, Resident of Village Parsauni.
3. Uttam Kumar @ Uttam Vishwakarama, aged about 23 years, son of Udesh Kumar Vishwakarma @ Udday Vishwakarma.
4. Upendra Saw, aged about 34 years, son of Horil Saw.
5. Bartu Saw @ Vikram Prasad Gupta, aged about 49 years, son of Hulash Saw.
6. Ravi Kumar @ Raviranjan Kumar, aged 21 years, son of Bikram Saw @ Bikram Prasad.
7. Gourav Kumar @ Gaurav Kumar, aged about 20 years, son of Vikram Saw @ Vikram Prasad.
8. Deepak Saw @ Deepak Kumar Gupta, aged 26 years, son of Vikram Saw @ Vikram Prasad Gupta.
9. Abhijit Kumar, aged 22 years son of Binay Ram @ Binay Kumar Ram.
… … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Parties ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anupam Anand, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P. -----
02/ 07.07.2025
Learned counsel representing the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this Anticipatory Bail Application and submits that they will appear before the concerned court below taking shelter of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of “Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773, Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in 2022 (10) SCC 51, Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in 2024 (9) SCC 198.
2.
The prayer is allowed.
3.
This anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
4.
If the petitioners appear, their case will be considered
2025:JHHC:18104 2
on its own merit by the trial Court, without being prejudiced by the
order of withdrawal passed by this Court and the trial Court will also consider the individual overt act of the petitioners and then will pass appropriate order.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) Sandeep. Cp-3