Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173192 (ALL)

SHASHIKANT SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

/11617/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11617 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. (I. A. No. NIL of 2025) 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Prakhar Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The application has been filed bringing on record the order dated 17.11.2025 by which the bail has been rejected in newly added Section 91 BNS. 3. The applicant is permitted to correct memo of bail application during the course of the day. 4. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.111 of 2025, under sections 69, 115(2), 333, 351(3), 352, 91 BNS, P.S. Husainganj, District Lucknow. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the applicant had formed physical relations with the informant for the last three years on false pretext of marriage. The victim is aged about 24 years. 6. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 7. Considering the relationship continued over a span of three years, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Shukla, Aftab Alam Malik Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shashikant Sharma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 8.9.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Shashikant Sharma be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 26, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11617 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench