Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173186 (ALL)

VISHW DEEP SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS

/11200/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11200 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard. 2. Under challenge are the notices dated 22.10.2025 and 17.11.2025, copies of which are Annexures 1 & 2 to the petition, under Section 94 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has already submitted reply to the aforesaid notices and prays that the said reply may be directed to be considered by the competent authority in accordance with law. To the aforesaid prayer, learned A.G.A. has no objection. 4. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority i.e. respondent No.3 to decide the reply of the petitioner to the notices under Section 94 of the B.N.S.S. dated 04.11.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-4 to the petition, in accordance with law, which could be decided within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that the Court has not gone into the merits of the case. November 26, 2025/prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanendra Pathak, Adarsh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Vishw Deep Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench