Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17318 (KAR)

NARASIMIAH v. RENUKUMAR

WP/32325/2018 · 2025-03-18

M G S Kamal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11067 WP No. 32325 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 32325 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: NARASIMIAH, DEAD BY HIS LR'S, 1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE NARASIMIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, RESIDING AT C/O RADHAKRISHNA, BEEMANA KUPPE VILLAGE, RAMOHALLI POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 060. 2. MURTHY, S/O NARASIMIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 3. JAYARAM, S/O NARASIMIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 4. RAMAKRISHNA, S/O NARASIMIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 5. RADHAKRISHNA S/O NARASIMIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS Digitally signed by ROOPA R U Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11067 WP No. 32325 of 2018 6. SOMASHEKAR S/O NARASIMIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, PETITIONERS 2 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT BEEMANA KUPPE VILLAGE, RAMOHALI POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 060. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VARADARAJAN, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. RENUKUMAR, S/O LATE MAYANNA & LATE SMT. SHARADAMMA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 2. VASANTHKUMAR S/O LATE MAYANNA & LATE SMT SHARADAMMA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 3. VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O LATE MAYANNA & LATE SMT SHARADAMMA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.78, 4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, K.K. LAYOUT, PAPAREDDYPALYA, BANGALORE - 560 072. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11067 WP No. 32325 of 2018 4. SMT. JAYAMMA, W/O CHELUVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT BEEMANA KUPPE VILLAGE, RAMOHALLI POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 060. 5. THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 5.4.2018 PASSED ON IA NO. 10 IN OS 115/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE 3RD ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT (ANNEXURE-A) ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Upon a memo filed by learned counsel for the petitioners seeking permission to retire from the case, and taking note of notice of retirement that was issued by - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:11067 WP No. 32325 of 2018 learned counsel, to the petitioners having been delivered to the petitioners, by order dated 04.02.2025, this Court had directed the names of the petitioners that reflect in the cause title to be printed in the cause list. Accordingly their names have been printed in the cause list. 2. There is no representation by the petitioners. Hence the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Registry to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE NG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2 CT: BHK