SATYENDRA KUMAR YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/1173/2025 · 2025-11-17
Arun Bhansali, Jaspreet Singh
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173176 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173176 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1173 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. This petition, purportedly in public interest, has been filed by the petitioners seeking direction to respondent no. 5, Nagar Nigam to remove the encroachment made by opposite party no. 6.
2. A perusal of the record indicates that pertaining to the disputed site, a suit filed by respondent no. 6 is pending consideration before the competent civil court wherein an interim order has been passed which appears to be in currency.
3. In view of the fact that qua the disputed site, the civil court is seized of the matter, filing of a PIL seeking some action by respondent no. 5 qua the suit land, cannot be countenanced.
4. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. November 17, 2025 SL/Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Tushar Verma (A.C.S.C.), Ravi Singh with Nischay Singh. (Jaspreet Singh,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Satyendra Kumar Yadav and 2 others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. through Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Urban Development U.P. Lko. and 5 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHYAM LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench