LORI YADAV @ LORIK YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/535/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173124 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173124 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 535 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.407 of 2024, under Sections 65(2) BNS and Section 5m/6 of POCSO Act, P.S.- Sarojini Nagar, District- Lucknow.
3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the daughter of informant, aged about 1 year, was taken by the applicant and wrong was committed to her. Medical on record indicates no injury whatsoever either on the external or internal part of the body of the victim. Hymen was found to be intact.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, medical on record, prima facie, the material to suggest substantial penetrative sexual assault is missing coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 05.10.2024 having no criminal history, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Lori Yadav @ Lorik Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Madhok, Jai Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lori Yadav @ Lorik Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 24, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 535 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench