Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17312 (KAR)

MRS. SHANAZ BEGUM v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/4746/2025 · 2025-02-18

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7133 WP No. 4746 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 4746 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. SHANAZ BEGUM W/O LATE MR. G. NAZEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO 29, B CROSS ROAD, THIMMAIAH ROAD CROSS, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE – 560051 2. MR. NADEEM AHMED, S/O LATE MR. G. NAZEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO 29, B CROSS ROAD, THIMMAIAH ROAD CROSS, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560051 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANOHAR N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGAR PALIKE N.R.SQUARE, BANGALURU-560 002 2. ZONAL COMMISSIONER EAST ZONE M.G.ROAD, 10TH FLOOR, SUBHAS CHANDRA BOSS BUILDING M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE -01. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING (EAST). EAST DIVISION BBMP, 21ST FLOOR, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7133 WP No. 4746 of 2025 SUBHAS CHANDRA BOSS BUILDING M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE -01. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE CONFIRMATION ORDER DATED. 05.11.2024 BEARING NO. SA.NI.NA.YO(PU)/CO/62/2024-25 PASSED UNDER 248(3) OF THE BBMP ACT BY THE R-3 VIDE ANNEXURE-H TO THE WRIT PETITION, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. As against the order of confirmation, the petitioners has the remedy of filing of an appeal, it would be open for the petitioners to raise all such contentions before the Appellate Authority including the averment that, they had not been notified of the provisional order. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7133 WP No. 4746 of 2025 2. This writ petition is therefore disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority and raise all such contentions that are available to him in law. 3. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20