Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173119 (ALL)

AZHAR HUSAIN KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/11463/2025 · 2025-12-01

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11463 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has prayed for the following substantial relief(s): "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party No.2 to 4 to take appropriate action against the opposite party no.5 to 7 during pendency of the civil suit and not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in question and also not alienate the property in the interest of justice. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no.5 to 7 to not alienate the property during pendency of writ petition and maintain status quo and also direct the court below to decide the stay application moved by petitioner expeditiously in the interest of justice. iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and direction the opposite party no.2 to 4 to consider and decide the representation dated 18.11.2025 with speaking and reasoned order, as contained in Annexure No.7 to this writ petition." 3. Upon perusal of the documents, it is clear that the dispute involved is private in nature and a civil suit is pending between the parties before the trial court concerned. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devanand Pandey, Ajay Kumar Pandey, Shobhit Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Azhar Husain Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. In view of the same, we cannot interfere in the matter. 5. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the trial court concerned for redressal of his grievances. In case any application moved by the petitioner is pending, the trial court is directed to hear and decide the same expeditiously. December 1, 2025 akhilesh/- WRIC No. 11463 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench