SUNNY YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT and ANR.
WRIA/6005/2020 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173113 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173113 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6005 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 16, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Kumar Yadav, Amit Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sunny Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Industrial Development And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench