IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE iPRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4936 OF 2025 Between: Pamidipalli Anil Kumar, S/o.Venkateswarlu, 37 years, R/o Pedakurapadu Village and Mandal, Guntur District, Presently Residing at Sun City, Bairaagi Guda, Hyderabad, Telangana State. ... Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the SHO, Arundalpet P.S, Guntur District Rep. Through the Public Prosecutor, State of Andhra Pradesh, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS (Old Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner on Bail in FIR No. 15 OF 2025 dated 15.01.2025 registered/ lodged on the file of Arundalpet P.S, Guntur District. Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri N Ashwani Kumar Counsel for the Respondent : Assistant Public Prosecutor. The Court made the following ORDER: APHC010235312025 THE HIGH.COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at amaravati (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO r.RlMINAL petition NO: 4936/2025 IN [3369] Hr THE HONOURABLE Between: ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED Pamidipalli Anil Kumar AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused; 1.N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER: been filed by the Petitioner/Accused under This Criminal Petition, has Sections 480 and 483 1. of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, in Cr.No.15 of 2025 of Arundalpet Police Station, ‘BNSS’) seeking regular bail in - Guntur District, registered for the offences punishable under sections 316(1), 318(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short. 'BNS') and Section 21(1)(2)(3) of Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019. in brief, is that the defacto complainant, who short films, became acquainted with the . The accused allegedly persuaded The Prosecution’s case 2. living by directing earns a petitioner/accused, a singer by profession through deceitful representations, to invest funds in NR the complainant Group ofCompani scrap trading. The les acPurportedly engaged in chemical recycling and chemical promised a commission of 10% to 20% on the invested amounts. Based on these assurances, to the the complainant introduced several other individuals approximately fi5 accused, resulting in the accused collecting crore from the However, the complainant and others under the pretext of investment deposits, commission verification of the company's existence misappropriated the funds for the present case has been accused neither paid the promised nor returned the deposits. failed to provide access to or and is alleged to have unlawfully on the complaint received. personal gain. Based registered. 3. Learned Counsel petitioner has been in judicial Statutory period, the for the Petitioner/Accused contends that the and despite expiry of not filed the Charge Sheet. custody since 23.01.2025 Investigating Officer has 4- Learned Assistant Public not disputed the said submiss- ^®P''®^enling the Respondent, has ion made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5- I have heard both sides. ®- Considering the tong days, this Court i custody cannot be based tamper with the accused would not the Petitioner has justice. remand period of the petitioner i.e. more than 90 view that the Petitioner’s continued preventive on an IS of the vi unsubstantiated or influence witnesses suspicion that he might and the release of the ampering of investigation. It is not in dispute that got permanent abode. evidence there is no possibility of fleeing from 7. In view of the fact that completion of the: Petitioner/Accused the Investigation Officer has not filed the Charge statutory period, this Court is inclined to grant Sheet despite regular bail to the under the following conditions; (a) Petitioner/Accused shall be enlarged of a bond for a surh of Rs.1,00,000/-1 two (02) sureties for a like sum each to the learned V Additional Junior Civil Judge Court on bail subject to execution (Rupees One Lakh Only) with satisfaction of the Guntur. (b) On release, the Petitioner/Accused shall House Officer, appear before the Station concerned on every Sunday in between 10.00 AM and 1.00 PM for a period of four (4) months from of charge sheet, whichever is earlier. today or till filing (c) The Petitioner/Accused shall threaten the witnesses under attempt shall be construed , not directly or indirectly contact any circumstances and or any such as an attempt of influencing the witnesses and shail not tamper evidence and shall cooperate with the investigation. (d) It is made clear that the Petitioner the above conditions and breach of will be viewed seriously and application for cancellation of the bail. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. shall scrupulously comply with any of the above conditions prosecution is at liberty to move an 8. ASsfsM^lJfM'VAS //TRUE COPY// 7RAR sect/on OFF/cer F( To 1. The V Additional Junior Civil Judge 2. The Superintendent, District Jail 3. The S.H.O, Arundalpet Police Station, 4. One CC to Sri N Ashwani Kumar Court, Guntur. , Guntur. Guntur District Advocate [OPUCj 5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (AP) High Court [OUT] 6. One spare copy of Andhra Pradesh cvss HIGH COURT TMR.J DATED;09/05/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.4936 of 2025 ALLOWED