Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173107 (ALL)

RAM LALAK YADAV v. TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL BIKAPUR, AYODHYA AND 4 OTHERS

A227/7299/2025 · 2025-12-18

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7299 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the State-respondent to decide Mutation Case No. T-202404230304123 (Ram Lalak Yadav Vs. Chandra Bhushan) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case State-respondent considers and decides the aforesaid appeal in the time bound manner. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Ayodhya is directed to decide Mutation Case No. T-202404230304123 (Ram Lalak Yadav Vs. Chandra Bhushan) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Lalak Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, Ayodhya And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) is no legal impediment. 8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 18, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 7299 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench