Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17308 (JHR)

SUNIL ALIAS GOBAR MARAIA ALIAS GOWARDHAN LOHRA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5638/2025 · 2025-07-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:18507] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5638 of 2025 Sunil @ Gobar Maria @ Gowardhan Lohra , aged about 30 years, S/o- Sona Ram Maraiya @ Sona Ram Lohra, R/o- Moti Pahari, P.O. & P.S- Borio, Dist- Sahibganj. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Ms. Saba Ali, Adv. For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar , Addl. PP. 02 / 09.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Borio PS Case No. 61 of 2021, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 341, 353, 307, 332, 333, 411, 427, 379, 224, 225 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was the member of an unlawful assembly which had assembled with traditional weapons and which attacked the police party as a result of which, some of the police personnel sustained injuries. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 19 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 21.03.2025 , as mentioned in para 18 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations have already been admitted on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 29.09.2021 passed in B.A. No. 8995 of 2021 hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Sahibganj in connection with Borio PS Case No. 61 of 2021 with the condition that the petitioner will not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-