KAUSHAL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME MINI. LKO AND ANOTHER
BAIL/865/2025 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173075 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173075 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 865 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.0299 of 2024 under sections 302, 201 and 120-B, P.S. Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the nephew of the informant was found dead. It was further stated that an information was received that on 19.06.2024, he had gone to meet the applicant and an apprehension was expressed that the applicant had killed him. The cause of death, as per the postmortem report is ante-mortem head injury. The co-accused has also been enlarged on bail.
4. Considering the fact that no recovery was effected from the applicant and the applicant has been linked, based upon the suspicion, coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal history and is in custody since 26.06.2024, as such, the applicant is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.
5. Let the applicant Kaushal Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Prakash Sharma, Sunny Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kaushal Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Mini. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 865 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench