SHYAMU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10534/2025 · 2025-10-30
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173074 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173074 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10534 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 370 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 65(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2), B.N.S., Section 3/4(2), Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 3(2)(v), Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, P.S. Tambour, District Sitapur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR allegations were leveled that the daughter of the informant was enticed by the applicant, however, subsequently, in her statements recorded under Section 180 and 183, B.N.S.S. the victim did not support the prosecution case. The tentative age of the victim is around 19 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the two statements of the victim, the applicant, who has been in custody since 20/09/2025 and has no criminal history, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Shyamu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anurag Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shyamu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 30, 2025 A.Nigam BAIL No. 10534 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench