ANURAG SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
/11246/2025 · 2025-11-19
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173067 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173067 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11246 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard Shri Yashvardhan Gupta, holding brief of Shri Parth Anand, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Faizal Hashmi, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 697 of 2025, under sections 85, 80(2) BNS, Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Shushant Golf City, District Lucknow South. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of informant was married to applicant on 25.2.2025 and subsequently information was received that she died. Allegation with respect to demand of dowry was also levelled. As per post mortem report on record the cause of death is asphyxia due to ante mortem hanging and apart from ligature mark no other injury was seen on the body of the deceased. Although the death has occurred soon after marriage however on perusal of the post mortem report it is clear that the death has occurred on account of ante mortem hanging and suicide note on record indicates that the victim has stated that no one should be blamed for the death neither the family nor the husband. 4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the said suicide note prima facie allegations against the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Parth Anand, Nadeem Murtaza Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anurag Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
applicant who is the husband are apparently missing more so when there is no statement in the suicide note to the effect that the victim was harassed either physically or mentally in relation to demand of dowry, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 6.8.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Anurag Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 19, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11246 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench