Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173043 (ALL)

JAMUNA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. AGRICULTURE EDU. AND RESEARCH SECTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/12687/2025 · 2025-10-31

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12687 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard Mr. H.L.Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Raghvendra Pratap Singh for opposite parties no. 1 and 2 and Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 3,4 and 5. By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief :- "i) Issue a writ, order and direction in the nature of mandamus to commanding the opposite parties to consider and make the payment of post retiral dues and pension under 'Old Pension Scheme' and paid the pension and other post retiral dues in accordance to the Old Pension Scheme to the Petitioner within time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court, with all consequential benefit. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamos commanding the opposite parties to make the payment of post retical dues and pension to the petitioner as per judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and Others reported in 2019 (10) SCC 516 as well as Writ - A No. 8968 of 2022 decided on 17.02.2023 and Special appeal No-97 of 2021 (State of U.P. & 4 Others Versus Bhanu Pratap Sharma) which was dismissed vide judgment and order dated 09.06.2021 within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that ends of justice would suffice if he is allowed to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3 and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time. With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage. Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hanumant Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Singh Jamuna Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Edu. And Research Sectt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) move a fresh representation within 15 days before the opposite party no. 3 i.e. Vice Chancellor, Narendra Dev University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, District Ayodhaya taking all his pleas and grounds and enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the opposite party concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. The decision on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. October 31, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 12687 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench