Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17301 (GAU)

ABI CHANDRA SARMAH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/4621/2023 · 2025-02-04

Lanusungkum Jamir

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010175512023 2025:GAU-AS:1145 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4621/2023 ABI CHANDRA SARMAH S/O- LATE SRIKANTA SARMAH, VILLAGE- GOLIA, P.O. PANIBHORAL, BISWANATH CHARIALI, DIST.- SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784176 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER-SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DIPSUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DRUGS CONTROLLER ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE ASSAM PHARMACY COUNCIL TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR HENGRABARI GUWAHATI- 36 4:THE INSPECTOR OF DRUGS SONITPUR DISTRICT TEZPUR Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHAKRAVARTY, MR. S UPADHAY,MS. A LALA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HEALTH, Page No.# 2/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR ORDER Date : 05.02.2025 Heard Mr. B. Chakravarty, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. B. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Health Department and Assam Pharmacy Council, on behalf of all the respondents. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved with the Cancellation Notice made under Section 36(1)(i) of the Pharmacy Act, 1948. The petitioner’s grievance is that prior to the cancellation of his pharmacist licence, he has not been furnished with the Executive Committee Resolution (6) dated 17.08.2022 and the Confirmation made by the State Council under Section 36(3) of the 1948 Act, which was the basis for cancelling the licence of the petitioner. 3. The petitioner’s counsel submits that due to the above, the petitioner has not been able to prefer an appeal in terms of Section 36 of the 1948 Act. He prays that a direction may be issued to the respondents, to furnish to the petitioner the Executive Committee Resolution (6) dated 17.08.2022 and the Confirmation made by the State Council under Section 36(3) of the 1948 Act. He also submits that similar cases have been disposed of by this Court, one of being WP(C) 1543/2024. He, accordingly, prays that the present writ petition may be disposed of, in terms of the order dated 18.03.2024 passed in WP(C) 1543/2024. 4. Mr. B. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Health Department and Assam Pharmacy Council, submits that the Executive Committee Resolution (6) and the Confirmation made by the State Council would be provided to the petitioner, Page No.# 3/4 within a period of 2 (two) weeks from the date of receiving the certified copy of this order. 5. I have heard the learned counsels for the parties. 6. On perusing the order dated 18.03.2024 passed in WP(C) 1543/2024, this Court finds that the present case is a covered matter and can be disposed of, in terms of the order dated 18.03.2024 passed in WP(C) 1543/2024. 7. Paragraph 7 and 8 of the order dated 18.03.2024 passed in WP(C) 1543/2024 is reproduced hereinbelow, as follows : “7. Accordingly, this Court is of the view that in terms of the order dated 24.11.2023, passed in W.A. No. 431/2023, the petitioners should be allowed to file an appeal as and when they are given a copy of the Executive Committee Resolution and the confirmation of the same by the State Council. 8. As an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 36(4) of the Act, 1948 is available and in the meantime, the Hon'ble Division Bench in a similar circumstance has relegated the similarly situated petitioners to approach the appellate authority, this writ petition stands disposed of with the following directions: I. The petitioners within a period of ten days from today shall submit a copy of the order passed by this Court today along with a copy of the writ petition to the respondent No.1. II. The respondent No. 1 within a period of two weeks thereafter shall provide a copy of the Executive Committee Resolution to the petitioners, whereby the decision to remove the name of the petitioners from the roll of the council was taken and a copy of the decision/confirmation made by the State Council. III. Thereafter, on receipt of the copies of the resolution made by the Executive Committee and the confirmation made by the State Council, the petitioners shall be at liberty to approach the Appellate Authority within the prescribed period of time under Section 36(4) of the Act, 1948. Page No.# 4/4 IV. Till the Resolution of the Executive Committee and confirmation by the State Council is provided to the petitioners, the orders of cancellation of licences of the petitioners shall remain suspended. The above is also subject to the condition that the petitioners should approach the respondent No.1 for furnishing copies of the Resolution of the Executive Committee and confirmation made by the State Council, within a period of 10(ten) days from today.” 8. On considering the submissions made by the counsels for the parties and the order dated 18.03.2024 passed in WP(C) 1543/2024, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to provide to the petitioner, the Executive Committee Resolution (6) and the Confirmation made by the State Council, within two weeks, from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with the copy of the writ petition. 9. Till the Resolution (6) of the Executive Committee and the Confirmation made by the State Council is provided to the petitioner, the orders of cancellation of the licence of the petitioner shall remain suspended. The above is however subject to the condition that the petitioner approaches the respondents with the certified copy of this order along with the copy of the writ petition, within 10 (ten) days from today. 10. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant