Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172986 (ALL)

TULSI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/10569/2025 · 2025-10-31

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10569 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.246 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 64(2)(M), 351(3), 352 of BNS, Police Station Rupaideeha, District Bahraich. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 16 was enticed by the applicant. In the statement under Section 180 of BNSS, the victim stated that she was married one year ago at Faqeerepurva, Nepal and on 21.06.2025, her relative i.e. the applicant came and thereafter she went with him to Mahipurva and stayed there for five years and thereafter to Pune where she stayed for one month. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the victim is married and stayed with the applicant for substantial long period of time coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 09.09.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Tulsi be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Tulsi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 31, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10569 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench