HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10412 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the accused persons. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts but has submitted that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. November 6, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharvan Kumar Pandey, Neelam Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Raksha Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench