SMT. SHABNAM @ SABNAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
NABAIL/1676/2025 · 2025-11-13
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172963 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172963 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1676 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant who has filed counter affidavit, as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.521 of 2024 under sections 419, 420, 506 I.P.C., P.s. Kotwali Nagar, district Gonda. 3.Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). November 13, 2025 kkb/ Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Adarsh Singh, Nikhil Kumar, Somnath Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Anand Pal Singh Vishen (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Smt. Shabnam @ Sabnam and Satya Prakash alias Satya Prakash Dwivedi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench