RAHUL POONIYA S/O NANDA RAM POONIYA (MINOR) v. THE COMMISSIONER, JAIPUR NAGAR NIGAM
CW/7805/2024 · 2025-03-19
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17296 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17296 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:12448] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7805/2024 Rahul Pooniya S/o Nanda Ram Pooniya (Minor), Aged About 16 Years, Through His Natural Guardian, Father Nanda Ram Pooniya S/o Shri Chuna Ram Punia, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Pooniyon Ki Dhani, Sarang Ka Bas, Durjania Bas, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Commissioner, Jaipur Nagar Nigam, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.
2. The Registrar, Registration Of Birth And Deaths, Doorjaniyavas, Panchyat Samiti, Jothwara, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 19/03/2025
1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of petitioner.
2. Instant civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by petitioner (minor through his natural guardian- father), seeking direction against respondents to change the date of birth of petitioner in his birth certificate dated 11.11.2021, from 01.01.2006 to 01.01.2008.
3. From perusal of the facts and grounds pleaded in the writ petition, seeking to change the date of birth in the birth certificate, it appears that all such grounds are factual, which requires to be established by the petitioner by way of adducing
[2025:RJ-JP:12448] (2 of 2) [CW-7805/2024] evidence and summoning the record of the Government Department/ Hospital.
4. This Court is of the considered view that the petitioner ought to have availed the remedy before the Civil Court, however, without availing the same, petitioner has invoked writ jurisdiction of this High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The recording of evidence and appreciation of factual aspect/ evidence, is not permissible by this Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
5. With the aforesaid observation/ liberty, instant writ petition is hereby disposed of.
6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/52