SHUBHAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/10681/2025 · 2025-12-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172947 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172947 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10681 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. Sri Ramakar Shukla appears for the informant. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.313 of 2025 under sections 103(1), 126(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, P.S. Lambhua, District Sultanpur. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that the son of the informant had gone out of home to Bazar when the accused who were named in the FIR started beating him and thereafter, the accused ran away. Subsequently, he was referred for medical examination to the Medical College, Lucknow where he died. The postmortem report indicates six injuries present on the deceased, which include contusion on the head, face, forearm, left shoulder, left side of chest and a parietal bone fracture was also noticed, which is also the cause of death. The eye witnesses have supported the testimony that the applicant had hit the victim, which resulted in injuries. 4. In terms of the statement of the eye witness, it was stated that on account of an old enmity with regard to the purchase of some tobacco products, the dispute had occurred in which the deceased was hit with a fist several times, which ultimately resulted in his death. 5. Considering the fact that the dispute had occurred on account of a petty Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sukh Deo Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ramakar Shukla Shubham Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
dispute earlier in between the same parties, prima-facie, the material to implicate the applicant under section 103 BNS is missing. Thus, looking to the nature of the allegations and the fact that the deceased was allegedly beaten up by the fist, the applicant who is in custody since 25.07.2025 and has the criminal history of two cases, which are minor in nature, the applicant is entitled for the bail. The bail application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Shubham Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 11, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 10681 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PANKAJ BHATIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench