Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172945 (ALL)

ARJUN KUMAR SAHANI @ARJUN SAHANI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

/10184/2025 · 2025-12-02

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10184 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MANOJ BAJAJ, J. Through this application, filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicants have prayed for quashing of charge sheet no.01 dated 3.7.2021, cognizance order dated 22.12.2021 passed by ACJM- II, court no.26, Lucknow in Criminal Case No.99181 of 2021, arising out of case crime no.0158 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Indira Nagar, District Lucknow and the proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 8.10.2025 (Annexure No.4) entered into between the parties. Learned counsel for the applicants- accused has drawn the attention of the Court to the compromise (Annexure No.4) to contend that the differences between the parties have been amicably settled and the complainant is not willing to prosecute the accused, therefore, he prays for intervention of this Court for quashing the impugned criminal proceedings in case no. 99181 of 2021 arising out of case crime no. 158 of 2020. At this stage, Mr. Vinay Mishra, Advocate appears on behalf of the complainant and has filed his power of attorney, who states that indeed the parties have settled the dispute and he has no objection, if the criminal proceedings instituted on his behalf are quashed in view of the compromise. Learned State Counsel has pointed out that the offences are Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Laxmi Shanker Goswami, Dinesh Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arjun Kumar Sahani @Arjun Sahani And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) compoundable and the parties are already before the trial court where they can move an application for compounding the offences in terms of Section 320 Cr.P.C. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the background of this case, this Court deems it appropriate to relegate the parties before the trial court to avail the alternative remedy of moving an application for compounding the offences in the light of the compromise (Annexure No.4) and in case, such an application is moved, the same be decided within a period of two weeks' after hearing all the parties. The petition is disposed of. Certified copy of the compromise deed dated 8.10.2025 (Annexure No.4) be returned to the counsel for the applicants. December 2, 2025 Raj A482 No. 10184 of 2025 2 (Manoj Bajaj,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench