ANEET KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 3 OTHERS
/11728/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172941 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172941 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11728 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the State- respondents.
2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him under law.
3. Learned counsel for respondents has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 16, 2025 Reena/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Manish Barnwal, Shivam Kumar Mishra (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Aneet Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench