RAJA RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/1691/2025 · 2025-10-30
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1691 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.0329 of 2024, under Section 103(1), 351(3) BNS, P.S. Mishrit, District Sitapur. 3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that two accused named in the FIR had gone with the deceased on 24.10.2024 and subsequently, his body was found. It was stated that the said two persons had killed the brother of the informant. The applicant was linked with the offence in question based upon last seen theory in terms of the statement of the witness wherein he stated that prior to the date of the incident, the applicant alongwith the co-accused and the deceased had drinks together and the applicant had committed the offence in the state of intoxication. 4. In the light of the said averment, learned counsel for the applicant argues that the name of the co-accused has not formed a part of the charge sheet and only the applicant has been named. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the fact that there are no eyewitness to the incident, the applicant has been linked based upon last seen theory and even as per the statement it is stated that he was in a state of intoxication, the applicant is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sarvesh Kumar Pandey, Amar Nath Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raja Ram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant Raja Ram be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 30, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 1691 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench