GHANSHYAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/6436/2025 · 2025-11-04
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172907 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172907 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6436 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Jaisingpur, District - Sultanpur, to decide Suit No. 632 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T 202104680702169) - Ghanshyam Singh and Others Vs. Urmila Singh and Others, U/S 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Jaisingpur, District - Sultanpur, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Jaisingpur, District - Sultanpur, is directed to decide Suit No. 632 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T 202104680702169) - Ghanshyam Singh and Others Vs. Urmila Singh and Others, U/S 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
November 4, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, Anurag Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Ghanshyam Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench