Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1729 (UTT)

SANJIV RAO v. SHALINI

CRLR/52/2025 · 2025-07-31

Pankaj Purohit

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6723 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CRLR No.52 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. This revision is shown by the Registry as defective. But, instead of praying for removal of the defect, learned counsel for the revisionist passed on to this Court order dated 21.07.2025 passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in Transfer Petition (Civil) No(s).2972 of 2024 Shalini Vs. Sanjiv Rao, and submits that all the litigation between the parties have come to an end in terms of the compromise. He placed reliance upon Para 4 of the said order. 3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the revisionist doesn’t want to press the present revision. 4. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the revisionist, the present criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 31.07.2025 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe 38331bac55c78b5f9f0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81 FAE064498483A83D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959 AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.07.31 16:16:55 +05'30'