Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17289 (AP)

Pepakayala Meheswara Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/12155/2025 · 2025-05-07

Subba Reddy Satti

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAWA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 12155 OF 2025 Between: Pepakayala Meheswara Rao, S/o.late Uppayya Aged about 71 Occ.Agriculture, R/o.D.No.2-135/1, Mandal, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District. years, Satyawada Village, K.Gangavaram ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Agent to the Government/District Collector, Alluri Sitharama Raju District at Paderu. 3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Mobile Court), Rampachodavaram Alluri Sitharama Raju District. 4. Chadala Ashok Kumar, S/o.Balayya, R/o.BandamamilIu Village Addateegala Mandal Alluri Sitharama Raju District. / ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring action of the 2"^^ respondent in not issuing necessary permission/orders to the 3rd respondent to trail the suit in O.S.No.13/2024 addressed by the 3rd respondent vide Ref.A/02/2025, dated 10.04.2025 as in view of the letter wholly illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue/provide necessary permission/orders to the 3rd respondent to trail the suit in O.S.No.13/2024 in the interest of justice and to and to more the pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2 nd respondent to issue/provide necessary permission/orders to the 3rd respondent to trail the suit in O.S.No.13/2024 in the interest of justice and to and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. MUSUDI BABJI Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3 : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following order: APHC010171012025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] ■£ THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 12155/2025 Betvs^en: ...PETITIONER Pepakayala Meheswara Rao, AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MUSUDI BABJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Sri Musudi Babji, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Swa^na Priya, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare, for respondents 1 to 3. Notice to respondent No.4 is dispensed with since no adverse order affecting his rights or interest has been passed. The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No. 2 in not issuing necessary permission to respondent No.3 to conduct trial of the suit O.S.No.13 of 2024, given the letter addressed by respondent No.3 vide Ref.A/02/2025 dated 10.04.2025, as illegal and arbitrary. \ V, X 2. 3. Page 2 of 3 40 Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the case was already transferred to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Mobile Court), Rampachodavaram, and she produced a copy of the instructions furnished by the District Collector, -Alluri Seetharama Raju District. The relevant portion of the instructions is extracted hereunder: 4. “It is further submitted that the Collector, ASR District has transferred the case to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Mobile Court), Rampachodavaram and the Mobile Court has taken up the case and numbered O.S.No. 13/2024 and the same is till under trail. 5. Thus, the grievance of the petitioner that respondent No.2 is not issuing orders, to respondent No.3 to try the suit O.S.No. 13/2024, is redressed. 6. Given the instructions of the learned District Collector, no further orders are required in this writ petition. 7. Hence, this writ petition is closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. MUSUDI BABJI Advocate [OPUC] 2. TwoCCsto GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies psk \ HIGH COURT \ DATED:08/05/2025 ORDER P'MS 2025 ^ ^ . Curreni Section OF X m WP.No.12155of2025 O Pif. CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITH NO COSTS