Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172880 (MAD)

RANGASAMY v. Chakkaravarthy (Deceased) 1. Alamelu

CMP/30021/2025 · 2025-12-02

R N Manjula

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No. 30021 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA CMP No. 30021 of 2025 in SA No.317 of 2012 1. RANGASAMY S/o. Dharmalinga Padyatchi, Salakarai, Periyakrishnapuram, Majra, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur Dt. Appellant(s) Vs 1. Chakkaravarthy (Deceased) 1. Alamelu W/o. Ramalinga Padayatchi, Periyar Nagar, Viruthachalam, Cuddalore Dt. 2.Rajalakshmi W/o. Rathina Padayatchi, Chinnamanalmedu, kattumannarkudi Taluk, Cuddalore Dt. 3.Chithra W/o. Selvanayagam, Kattuputhur, Viruthachalam, Cuddalroe Dt. 4.Thenmozhi W/o. Ravi, Chinnamanalmedu, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 30021 of 2025 Kattumannarkudi Taluk, Cuddalore Dt. 5.Sudha D/o. Kasirajan, Chinnamanalmedu, Kattumannarkudi Taluk, Cuddalore Dt. 6.C. Padmavathi S/o. Late. Chakravarthi, Salakkarai, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur Dt. 7.C. Soundararajan S/o. Late. Chakravarthi, Salakkarai, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur Dt. 8.C. Sankar S/o. Late. Chakravarthi, Salakkarai, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur Dt. 9.C. Sundari D/o. Late. Chakravarthi, Salakkarai, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur Dt. 10.C. Sivaraman S/o. Late. Chakravarthi, Salakkarai, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur Dt. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to set aside the Order dated 14.06.2024 in SA No.317 of 2012 and restore the Second appeal on file and same may be posted for arguments. For Appellant(s): Mr.C.Parthiban For Respondent(s): M/s G.Anabayachozhan https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 30021 of 2025 for R1 to R6 ORDER This petition is filed to set aside the order dated 14.06.2024 in SA No.317 of 2012 and restore the Second appeal on file. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to some miscommunication / lack of communication, he was not aware of the death of the parties and that has resulted in confusion. 3. The respondent has also got no objection to allow this petition and to restore the second appeal which was dismissed for default on 14.06.2024. The delay in filing this petition has already been condoned by this Court vide order dated 22.09.2025. Hence, in the interest of justice and in order to allow the parties to contest the matter on merits, I feel this petition should be allowed. 4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed and the order https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 30021 of 2025 dated 14.06.2024 made in S.A.No.317/2012 is set aside and the Second Appeal is restored on file. 02-12-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 30021 of 2025 R.N.MANJULA J. bkn CMP No. 30021 of 2025 In SA No.317/2012 02-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis