Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17288 (DEL)

ANITA RANI v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE KAROL BAGH AND ANR

W.P.(C)/5683/2025 · 2025-05-28

Manoj Kumar Ohri

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5683/2025 ANITA RANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohak Bhadana (DHCLSC), Advocate. versus SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE KAROL BAGH AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rachita Garg and Mr. Agam Rajput, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Kangan Roda, SPC for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA O R D E R % 08.09.2025 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 56116/2025 (Exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM APPL. 56115/2025 (Directions) 3. The present application under Section 151 of the CPC seeks following prayers:- “a) direct the Respondent no.2 to comply with the award dated 16.05.2023 passed by the Ld. CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Rouse Avenue District Courts, New Delhi in I.D. No. 07/2021; b) direct the Respondent no.1 to initiate recovery proceedings in terms of letter dated 24.01.2024 (Annexure A-3); and c) pass any other order or orders which this Hon 'ble Court deems just and proper in the interest of justice.” 4. The captioned petition was disposed of vide order dated 28.05.2025, which reads as under:- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2025 at 12:45:28 “1. The present matter arises in the context of an award dated 16.05.2023. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that despite issuance of recovery certificate on 24.01.2024, the same has not been implemented till date. 2. Learned counsel appearing for GNCTD states that as per the memo of parties, the show cause notices have been issued to Ministry of Home Affairs, however the concerned department being M.N.ER could not be located. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 states that necessary details would be passed to learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 within a period of two weeks from today. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 submits that as soon as the instructions are received, the concerned SDM would take necessary steps for implementation of the award. 3. In view of the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of in above terms. The liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court in case the process is not completed within eight weeks from today.” 5. Issue notice. 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1 accepts notice. 7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 2 accepts notice and seeks time to take appropriate instructions. Let the needful be done before the next date of hearing. 8. List on 07.11.2025. AMIT SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER 08, 2025/sn/dj This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2025 at 12:45:28